miraclegoose
stranger
Reged: 04/14/06
Posts: 4
|
|
I've seen it twice and I loved it both times. I, too, missed the Dan/Blythe scene but immediately caught the allusion to Dan while Langdon signed the books. Loved the "facist Opus Dei" remark. Great job Dan, Ron, and Tom et all!
|
AbbySinead
stranger
Reged: 08/19/05
Posts: 9
Loc: New York
|
|
I am seeing it again Tuesday with my husband, I am going to look for more hidden goodies!
-------------------- IN DARKNESS MY HEART WAS WON...
|
PhiPI
stranger
Reged: 11/02/05
Posts: 32
|
|
Terribly disappointed... 
So much time WASTED on added scenes including magical powers (sophie healing tom hanks with her aura?? Langdon's "photographic memory" illustrated in CG?? These were not in the book - for a reason!) Unfortunately the filmmakers rushed through the real gold that is the Da Vinci Code - the audience's own participation in trying to solve the riddles. Practically every single one was explained within 1-2 minutes of its introduction, and sometimes immediately after, leaving no time to even ponder what it could mean. Then the ideal proportions left out completely, no explanation of the vitruvian man or why a dying man would position himself naked like that with the fibonacci sequence, or why sophie chose the sequence for the bank code in order. And for all the 3 minutes spent watching "A Beautiful Mind" computer generated rearranging of letters in Langdon's mind, there is no visual or other hint that the 'missing orb' is an apple -- yes computer generated planets are nice, floating rearranging letters are nice, but what a waste.
I saw the movie with a friend who had never read the book and I resented that I had to explain all the 'best parts' that were left out (like this) or explain that the reason why its a bestseller is because in the book the puzzle solution is not handed out immediately so there is some thought process involved. Furthermore, after seeing it the grail as Mary Magdalene idea was to her a totally fictitious yet decent plot element, along the lines of indiana jones and the sankara stones, and was shocked when I said there might be some truth in it and by the number of tv specials trying to 'debunk' such a silly and melodramatic plot in the first place.
Tom Hanks was so wrong for the role. Sophie's overly dramatic lines and new supernatural abilities - so wrong. Some changes were necessary for film, like the key falling out from behind the Madonna of the Rocks rather than being pried out, and the Sony product placement was, I suppose, to be expected. But the ENDING....  Unfortunately, as a fan who has read the book several times I was distracted and then angered by so many completely unnecessary changes to the story during the movie, and the generally incoherent message which was the result. The adaptation by the screenwriters was obnoxious and very poor, and my friend, who has never read the book, will probably have forgotten DVC in a week. 
The good news is that the movie is so forgettable that maybe religious fanatics will stop accusing DVC of being a huge threat to religion and stop the Dan Brown The Antichrist protest shenanigans, not pour goat's blood in his driveway and leave the poor man alone.
|
filmaker
stranger
Reged: 05/21/06
Posts: 1
|
|
Hilarious teaser of DA VINCI COCK here : http://www.comitedelaclaque.com/frame.php?go=3&video=davinci_cock
|
MsVetra
enthusiast
Reged: 09/29/05
Posts: 300
Loc: UK
|
|
LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
ktmason
member
Reged: 11/30/05
Posts: 172
Loc: Texas
|
|
I am afraid I have to agree. This movie actually SUCKED. 1/2 hr to long, to many changes, the ending had some people laughing....come on! Langdon prays! Gimme a break. All this time and I almost fell asleep.
Ron Howard should be ashamed!
-------------------- KTMason
|
PhiPI
stranger
Reged: 11/02/05
Posts: 32
|
|
Is that what people were laughing about? I almost laughed when Sophie said, "when my grandfather couldn't reach me, he reached out to you instead" and I was waiting for the un-intentionally funny Tom Hanks moment all the critics made fun of but I never saw it.
|
Adrenaline
stranger
Reged: 12/19/05
Posts: 12
|
|
I, too, was a tad bit disappointed. I think its mainly because they didnt have enough time to put everything into a 2hr movie (was it that long?). And i mean, why do they have to make Sophie and Sauniere so violent? That scene (Sophies flashback when she was trying to find info her family)was so out of character. Also the scene where Teabing and Langdon disagree with eachother i think was out of character and sometimes it looked like Langdon doesnt know what Leigh is talking about whreras in the book he does.
Now Silas, I loved the name variations. And yes he didnt have red eyes, and if you think about it he didnt really look that albino-ish but i think Paul Batteney made an alright Silas. By the way, i thought he was supposed to be french, and not Italian... the same with the "teacher"? 
And why did they have to cut "robert, you have brought me a virgin" and the "robbing off the climax" i was looking forward for that! True they swapped it with something "staright to the point" but still... Although, i have to say, Ian McKellen did an excellent job on Teabing.
The scene with the library card was so hallerious! It just showed that they didnt have time but i mean, really... 
I liked the ending though, apart from the remarkable finding that Sauniere wasnt Sophie's grandfather and that Sophie and Langdon were supposed to kiss and go on a date (although the joke with the wine was good)it was good.
And since when Collet will ever address Fache "Bazu"? that too was annoying. Actually the whole Collet was annoying really... the age and all. And Fache would never say "You know im an Opus Dei" I mean seriously.
I think there will be an extended version of the movie which showed fill up some wholes as it were. So there were quite a bit of stuff that werent to my liking but that is not going to stop me seeing it again on friday in 2 weeks.
-------------------- Dont take life seriously, you will never get out of it alive.
|
Junco75
stranger
Reged: 05/22/06
Posts: 2
|
|
The Archbishop of the Opus Dei was called "your eminence" instead of "your excellency", by some member of the press on board the OD plane.
|
jwrobel0398
stranger
Reged: 05/22/06
Posts: 2
|
|
Hello Folks,
I'm new here and wanted say a few things that some may not like. First let me say I am a 32nd degree Freemason (York Rite), a member of the Royal Order of Scotland and a Catholic.
I wasn't impressed by the content of neither the book or the movie, although the film did offer some entertainment value.
What I am amazed about is the assertions made in The Da Vinci Code are old news and I believe to be nothing short of plagarism. If you would read, "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" and the, "Messianic Legacy" written by M. Baigent, R. Leigh and H. Lincoln (published in 1982 and 1986 respectively) you uwould see exactly what I am talking about.
Dan Brown basically made a novel out of these two books which were basically offered as a, "factual" account of the history of Christs life, his supposed crucifiction and his surviving blood-line.
Everyone is singing the praises of Dan Brown for being such a talented and imaginitive writer and it's nothing more than old rehashed material.
Thanks for your perusal.
|