ktmason
member
Reged: 11/30/05
Posts: 172
Loc: Texas
|
|
Well, its 2008, a new National Treasure is out, more Masonic books are in print, and still no Dan Brown. Since the movie didnt really do so well, and the movies (and books) told a MUCH better, more exciting, and more accurate story, do you think that Dan may have given up? Thoughts please.
-------------------- KTMason
|
Sephia
Supreme Goddess
Reged: 11/28/03
Posts: 876
Loc: MA, USA
|
|
Yes. I really doubt that he is going to write anything more. He let the public completely lose interest in him, and it seems he'll go down in history as yet another one-hit wonder.
(one hit, since only DVC was ever really immensely popular)
-------------------- "Your life is yours alone, rise up and live it" ~Terry Goodkind
|
Arras
enthusiast
Reged: 05/24/04
Posts: 263
Loc: B.C., Canada
|
|
Certainly The DaVinci Code will be a very tough act to follow. Brown may well have cut short his writing career by playing his high-value cards too early--the aces are on the table now, and even if he comes up with kings and queens for a sequel it will be seen as a failure.
As many writers will tell you, early success--even on a much more modest scale than The DaVinci Code--is one of the worst things that can happen to a writer. Thereafter everything you write gets compared to your early masterpiece, and it's almost always an unfavourable comparison. In large part this is because the original work sparked a pop culture phenomenon by jabbing a lot of people in a sore spot with a sharp stick, and once people lose their sensitivity it doesn't work again unless you allow a long enough period to elapse between attempts--years, usually, and sometimes an entire generation.
It's also often the death of creativity in your career, since your fans all want you to write sequels and don't care much for any new and unrelated works you might want to write. This will be a problem for J.K. Rowling in her post-Potter career. There's enormous pressure (and big money on offer) to return to the characters and worlds that made you famous, even if you've run out of clever things to do with them. It's rare that an author with that degree of success manages to carry that success over to unrelated future works.
The other problem that early success leads to is the desire to keep upping the ante in an attempt to make the next book more thrilling and more controversial than the last. Whatever worked the first time, let's take it up another notch! You can't keep doing this indefinitely, of course, any more than you can keep increasing the tension and suspense in a story without eventually relieving it. Pretty soon Robert Langdon is exposing a conspiracy by lizardmen from Zeta Reticulon--who were naturally behind the events of 9/11, in collusion with a secret cabal of former world leaders, Masons, and the Pope, who've been plotting this since the Roswell crash in 1947! Once the shark has finally been jumped, interest dies off quickly, and usually with some disgust. Better to "leave them wanting more", as the show business adage goes.
On the plus side for Brown, The DaVinci Code has likely set him up for life, financially, so he can retire quietly on a high note. Much as there's reader demand for a sequel, writing an inevitably disappointing follow-up would tarnish his legacy. The more he tries to write at this point, the more The DaVinci Code looks like a fluke--an accidental success that owed less to Brown's writing skills than to its controversial subject matter.
On the other hand, what may be best for Brown--if he still has any interest in pursuing a writing career--is simply to start writing under a new alias for a while. He can even pretend to be one of his own imitators--a writer trying to cash in on The DaVinci Code's success by writing a "better" sequel. That way the pressure is off, and if his new books fail people will merely say, "he's no Dan Brown."
|
Sephia
Supreme Goddess
Reged: 11/28/03
Posts: 876
Loc: MA, USA
|
|
That's what JKR is planning to do with her next children's book--find a new pseudonym, so they won't be considered any kind of comparison to Harry Potter. I suppose that works if the author is talented. Yet, playing off earlier successes is a sure way of selling copies of the books, even if they aren't as good as the last ones.
-------------------- "Your life is yours alone, rise up and live it" ~Terry Goodkind
|
ktmason
member
Reged: 11/30/05
Posts: 172
Loc: Texas
|
|
Actually Aarras, I think he didnt take advantage fast ENOUGH! A&D was good, and DVC was a decent follow up. He really should have started the sequel sooner. I really think he got greedy with the publicity and went after all that star power and let it all slip away.
Now, to many jumped on the book band wagon, NT2 is own with more movies promised, and DB has been passed by. Whatever he puts out now, it will NEVER live up to DVC. HE let it, and ALL HIS READERS down.
I think the name of his board should be changed!!
-------------------- KTMason
|
EVDebs
enthusiast
Reged: 07/10/05
Posts: 272
|
|
ktmason,
I think DB can redeem himself and follow up on the long thread regarding a Third Temple in Jerusalem ... see
http://www.cultofdanbrown.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/5334/page/1/view/collapsed/sb/5/o/all/fpart/1
The info contained in that thread is enough for DB to write a damn good novel out of, and the added benefit of exposing the Third Temple madness the news media never discloses yet allows novelists like Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins and others to carry on with along with the "Arab street's" Mahdi fascination.
Just think, DB can have EVERYBODY pissed at him by writing this novel.
Don't worry, ktmason, I think DB reads this website and if he's smart he'll do what I'm suggesting.
|
ash
journeyman
Reged: 11/29/05
Posts: 74
Loc: Bombay India
|
|
HI EV
Since u communicate only thru posts here and guess dont bother to read mails. Sol and few others have started a new forum on halexandria.org.He will be surely happy to welcome u
Ash
|
ktmason
member
Reged: 11/30/05
Posts: 172
Loc: Texas
|
|
Yes, EV, even God listens to you. Say, I'd really like to hear (well, read) your thoughts on this: TECHNICALLY, Herods Temple is the THIRD temple...he DID really tear down Zerubbabel's Temple (though the sacrifices continued...hence Herod's is still called the SECOND temple), to do his "remodeling", and in fact built a new temple. Couldn't DB use that little tid bit and force a conspiracy?? After all, the Ark, etc, were not there. What'ya think??
-------------------- KTMason
|
EVDebs
enthusiast
Reged: 07/10/05
Posts: 272
|
|
Yep, from my lips to God's ears ! But seriously, Mt. Moriah, the Temple Mount, can be the only site for the Temple,
http://www.templemount.org/moriah2.html
and
http://www.templeinstitute.org/birds_eye.htm
Means that de facto another Temple being built will be viewed as the Third Temple. In my view of this, an unnecessary Temple but that's IMHO and will cause offense to many.
Don't give up the ship, ktmason. BTW, I haven't seen the new National Treasure flick, re Lincoln's assassination, what do you think of it ?
|
EVDebs
enthusiast
Reged: 07/10/05
Posts: 272
|
|
I'll look up that site. Sorry of lack of communication but I've been waiting for the movie and nothing seems to be coming down the pike with Dan Brown so I checked back into this site.
|