SeraphicRadiance
stranger
Reged: 09/08/05
Posts: 11
|
|
Before reading A&D, All I knew about the Illuminati was all this New World Order business. After reading this book, I have a new understanding about them. But how much of it is fact? The scientist bit is definately true, but I have some questions that need verifying:
1. Was Galileo really an Illuminatus? 2. Was there actually a path of illumination? 3. Are the brands real? 4. Do the scientists have anything to do with the Bavarian Illuminati?
I am tired of wading through all the conspiracy theories on the internet. Who were the original Illuminati? what are the hard facts?
Thank you for your time.
|
Salias
stranger
Reged: 09/18/05
Posts: 10
|
|
There probably is a path of illumination, or do you think that all of those clues to the next altar of science were all just in perfect order forming a cross by coinsidence.
|
Shadowglass
stranger
Reged: 07/08/05
Posts: 48
Loc: Canada
|
|
Since Illuminati literally means 'enlightened ones' in Latin, it is natural that several unrelated historical groups have identified themselves as Illuminati. Often, this was due to claims of possessing gnostic texts or other arcane information not generally available.
The designation illuminati was also in use from the 14th century by the Brethren of the Free Spirit.
The one most commonly refered to, and the one that Dan uses is the Bavarian Illuminati a short-lived movement of republican freethinkers, the most radical offshoot of The Enlightenment, whose adherents were given the name Illuminati (but who called themselves "Perfectibilists"), was founded on May 1, 1776 by the ex-Jesuit Adam Weishaupt , professor of canon law, and Baron Adolph von Knigge, in Ingolstadt, Bavaria.
In 1784, the Bavarian government banned all secret societies including the Illuminati and the Freemasons. The structure of the Illuminati soon collapsed, but while it was in existence many influential intellectuals and progressive politicians counted themselves as members.
The order had its branches in most countries of the European continent, but its total numbers never seem to have exceeded two thousand. Internal rupture preceded its downfall, which was effected by an edict of the Bavarian government in 1785.
Very little reliable evidence can be found to suggest that Weishaupt's group survived into the 19th century. However, several groups have since used the name Illuminati to found their own rites, claiming to be the Illuminati. Such groups include the Grand Lodge Rockefeller of David Goldman (USA), Orden Illuminati of Gabriel López de Rojas (Spain), and The Illuminati Order of Solomon Tulbure (USA)
I'll stop here but if your still thirsting for more let me know.
|
Shadowglass
stranger
Reged: 07/08/05
Posts: 48
Loc: Canada
|
|
As far as the brands are concerned...did you ever wonder why they were in english. If the Path of Enlightnment was in Rome the whole time, Italian or Latin would make more sense
|
Arras
enthusiast
Reged: 05/24/04
Posts: 263
Loc: B.C., Canada
|
|
Quote:
Shadowglass said: As far as the brands are concerned...did you ever wonder why they were in english. If the Path of Enlightnment was in Rome the whole time, Italian or Latin would make more sense
I believe this was answered in at least one other thread around here somewhere. The choice of English apparently had to do with the obscurity of that language at the time--the Illuminati's enemy was the Roman Catholic Church, which operated, as you say, in Latin and Italian. Writings in common languages would be easier to spot as treacherous, so in a way, the choice of English was a form of encryption (or at least steganography). Think of all the Westerners these days who wear tattoos of Oriental pictograms, knowing that very few people in the West will be able to recognize those symbols or interpret their meaning. By choosing a language not widely spoken in your area, you effectively end up with a sort of "secret writing".
|
Onuris
stranger
Reged: 11/23/05
Posts: 2
|
|
Quote:
Arras said:
Quote:
Shadowglass said: As far as the brands are concerned...did you ever wonder why they were in english. If the Path of Enlightnment was in Rome the whole time, Italian or Latin would make more sense
I believe this was answered in at least one other thread around here somewhere. The choice of English apparently had to do with the obscurity of that language at the time--the Illuminati's enemy was the Roman Catholic Church, which operated, as you say, in Latin and Italian. Writings in common languages would be easier to spot as treacherous, so in a way, the choice of English was a form of encryption (or at least steganography). Think of all the Westerners these days who wear tattoos of Oriental pictograms, knowing that very few people in the West will be able to recognize those symbols or interpret their meaning. By choosing a language not widely spoken in your area, you effectively end up with a sort of "secret writing".
also, to buttress Arras' point, in the book Angels & Demons, Max Kohler states that English is the "language of science"
|
Sephia
Supreme Goddess
Reged: 11/28/03
Posts: 876
Loc: MA, USA
|
|
actually, math has always been the language of science. that and some latin-ish stuff (like names of the elements). Note also that the sciences use the metric system, not the English or American one.
They called English the lingua pura in A&D simply because it is the furthest removed from Latin. French and Spanish are rather close to it, but English is not. For that matter, they could have used Russian. Or Zulu. Or any of a bunch of other non-Romantic languages. However, at the time, Europe was the center of the world, figurativly speaking,of course, and Italian, Spanish, French, and English were the most popular choices. Of those, English was the one chosen.
-------------------- "Your life is yours alone, rise up and live it" ~Terry Goodkind
|
Hayoroweu
stranger
Reged: 11/23/05
Posts: 9
|
|
Does any one know if Galileo was actually an illuminatus?
|
DHN
stranger
Reged: 01/04/06
Posts: 20
|
|
At the highest levels of free masonry there are alleged to be the illuminati levels. My father was a 33 degree free mason and it goes back several genrations in my family. He was initiated into 'The Knights Templar' (to a degree, pardon the pun), and the 'Rosicrusians'. I asked him aboout the 'Illuminati' once, and he later said 'who is the Illuminati anyway?' After he died, I found a book in the back of his wardrobe, and the pages were binded in such a way that you had to use a knife to seperate them. Some of the pages he had read went into some depth about the 'Illuminati', so he was more than aware of their existence, so he must have at least known of them and for some reason try and deny any knowledge of them to me for some reason. He did answer some questions, cryptically about 'The All Seeing Eye' saying that 'there is only one God', also saying 'that you should fear if there is a God... not if there isn't one'. So he must have been concealing the truth from me I feel.
|
RoseyORyan
member
Reged: 04/03/05
Posts: 128
Loc: Scotland
|
|
The so-called "Illuminati" were a bunch of chancers and, ultimately, LOSERS! Masquerading under the esoterically- sounding "Illuminati", Adam Weishaupt cajoled his naive disciples to infilterate various European lodges of Freemasonry in an attempt to steal their 'secrets' and thereby establish his own network of influence among the Chancellories of Europe, circa 1770. Unfortunately, it all ended in tears in 1776. Still, there are some classic quotes to be gleaned in the exchanges between the conspirators. [See, Bavarian Govt. Archives].The rest is 'history'. Dear DHN, The earliest forms of 'freemasonry' (being of a Jacobite nature) did not specify ONE god or MANY gods! Critical inquiry will provide each with their OWN god...but "which god" is the question. As Ever, Rosey
|
DHN
stranger
Reged: 01/04/06
Posts: 20
|
|
to clarify, I asked my father if the freemasonic God was the Christian God to which he replied 'There is only one God'... he later showed me a picture of a Mayan symbol in relation to this of an eye in the palm of a hand. In several of his freemasonic books (that the masons retrieved after his death, except for one), there were references to Jebalon, and the 'Morning Star', which some have interpreted as 'Light Bearer'. Their concept of god to my mind refers it's many faces, wether it is Baal, Jehova and so on having influenced the major religions of this world. But they would believe I would say in one force that is disguised as many gods, as symbolised by the 'All Seein Eye' (that is one eye). Some may feel that this represents a malign force, that illuminates rather than enlightens. In Islam they believe that the devil has one eye, as the right 'good eye' was blinded.
Edited by DHN (01/09/06 04:49 AM)
|
ktmason
member
Reged: 11/30/05
Posts: 172
Loc: Texas
|
|
DHN
I am a 32nd degree, Knight Templar Mason, and I do know my stuff.I have no idea where you are getting all of this. I have NEVER heard of a Master Mason saying anything like what you have stated your dad said. Are you SURE you heard your father say that?
Could you clarify? I happen to know that 90% of Masons are Christian.
I really do NOT want to start a squabble, but I also do NOT like folks slandering us. I am NOT saying you are, but stuff like this makes a Masons blood boil.
What your father said, again, I have NEVER heard a Master Mason say. Perhaps you can ask him again--maybe you just heard wrong.
And maybe I read it wrong. Again, please re-clarify, and if I am wrong I WILL apologize. If you wish to know things about Masonry, there ARE Masons on this board--simply ask.
Corsig---feel like jumping in here?
-------------------- KTMason
Edited by ktmason (01/19/06 07:07 AM)
|
ktmason
member
Reged: 11/30/05
Posts: 172
Loc: Texas
|
|
VERY good guy. Thanks..
-------------------- KTMason
|
DHN
stranger
Reged: 01/04/06
Posts: 20
|
|
It was never my intention of making yours or anyone elses blood boil. I have had long conversations with freemasons (Royal Arch), so perhaps I should have been clearer that I am referring to this order in particular, and I can understand that it is all too easy to take take things the wrong way. The conversations that I had with my father were as I said they were, although they are very ambiguous for instance you could say they he was confirming that the masonic God is indeed Christian by saying 'There is only one God'. It is well known in literature that the name 'Jebalon' is an eclectic term. I have known freemasons from a variety of faiths including Hindu, so as I am sure you know the brotherhood does not exclude non Christians. As I understand it their beliefs predate Christiainity, for instance Royal Arch Freemasonry, they refer to themselves as 'Antedeluvians' (survivors of the flood). If you read what my father said, he denied any knowledge of the so called 'Illuminati', and any assumption that he was fefraining from telling me the truth is my own personal interpretation. Although there are oaths to symbolically 'Have your tongue cut away' (not to be taken literally of course), when oaths of secrecy are taken to join freemasonry, I believe that when my father said 'fear if there is a God, not if there is not one', that he was actually speaking from a personal capacity sharing his own philosophy. I was also having a conversation about God with my brother at the time when he interjected.
I read some of my fathers freemasonic books, which used a great deal of abbreviations and there was mention of 'morning star', and although I could indeed be mistaken for misinterpreting the context, I have every right to do so interpret them as I see fit. To be clear I am not saying that on a personal level, that I believe that the 'Illuminati' had infultrated 'Royal Arch Freemasonry', but I daren't say that the only way to know is to be invited. I am not saying that your Lodge has anything to do with this topic, and that I am only speaking from the limited experiences that I have had within my own family, who were 'Royal Arch Freemasons'. So I cannot vouch for the Knight Templar Masons, Rossicrucians, and I am sure that there are a great deal of differences between these societies.
I can say that with respect that I have every right to share ideas and views, and that the secrecy surrounding such institutions only invites suspicion, and that the internet, book stores, television and cinema are rife with 'speculation' about what the secrecy. Correct me if I am wrong, even within freemasonry one degree is for the most part oblivious to the knowledge of the next degree. I remember one conversation I had with a friend of my fathers who was also a mason, and his blood boiled in a similar way. He said that 'You would not believe the things that I have seen', to which I replied 'You wouldn't believe the things I have seen either... but I can talk freely about them and you can't'. Having said that I was very close to him, and I loved my father.
I have nothing against you or your beliefs and you have every right to express your opinions. I personally believe that we are all connected to God on an inner level, and that we are ultimately all One. That I am 100% sure of, and that to me nothing else is written in stone, so I have an open mind and I am more than interested and open to what you have to say. Respectfully.
Edited by DHN (01/19/06 11:10 PM)
|
ktmason
member
Reged: 11/30/05
Posts: 172
Loc: Texas
|
|
DNH You didn't make my blood boil, it was that some of the statements COULD have. I would have said (and had Aarras rebuke me--probably rightfully) if they did.
I have heard much of this stuff before, usually by fundamentalist Christians trying to "save" us. Even IF you were that (and I am not saying you are) you are right--you DO have every right to share. They haven't thrown ME out--yet, at least. So maybe Arras is right--I may come on to forceful--for that I apologize.
Let me see if I can respond to your statements.
Yes, we accept ANY man with a belief in a supreme being. We do not chose what that being is for the individual. Its a fraternity, not a religion. Hindu does predate Christianity.
I think you were trying to say 'Jubalon"--sometimes spelled "Jahbaalon". This term does have relavance to the Royal Arch Degree. It means: "Jah"--Jehovah;, "baal"--which is (believe it or not, see your Bible)Lord; and "on"--Light, or Power. Therefore: Jahovah the Lord of Power.
The BOOK you read with "morning star" in it was probably "Morals and Dogma" by Albert Pike. Pike revitalized the Scottish Rite, revamped the degrees, and confused everyone for time without end with his book. The MAIN problem is is that education was different then than now. Greek and Latin, with great emphasis on the classics of literature was the norm then--they aren't now (oh, that they would be!) Therefore, most of what Pike said is not understood today. Additionally, if one reads the Preface to the book, you will find a statement saying that things within the book are NOT to be accepted "in toto." In other words, you can believe what he said or not.
As for Royal Arch, this is a seperate degree system containing Mark Master, Past Master, up to the Royal Arch. These degrees are NOT required, but continue the story of the Third Degree. They consist of legends, none of which anyone takes seriously (save for the lessons taught).
If you have any questions about them, I will be more than happy to answer either here or off board. As you can tell, I am very happy to share all but a few things.
As for Scottish Rite, you do realize, I hope (if not I am going tell you anyway) the 33rd Degree is JUST AN HONOR. It contains no new information, and was designed to honor those who have done much, and have honored the fraternity.
33rd Degree Masons "run" nothing. They are honored rothers, nothing more. If your father was a 33 degree, he must have been a very good man and a very loyal brother Mason.
One last thing....you will NEVER be invited. You have to ask.
Actually, Royal Arch (as a "degree system")came AFTER the Illuminati. The degree itself came from a French System no longer around. The Scottish and York Rites teach simular lessons--the Royal Arch Degree is called (depending on the Jurisdiction) the Royal Arch of Solomon in the Scottish rite.
And I knock EV for long posts! Sorry.
Anyway, I hope I may have answered a question or two for you, and sorry if I came on a little harsh.
-------------------- KTMason
|
Shadowglass
stranger
Reged: 07/08/05
Posts: 48
Loc: Canada
|
|
Illuminati is not the name for a group of people, it is a term used to refer to them. For the true "Illuminati" in the modern world type Bilderberg into your search engine.
|
ktmason
member
Reged: 11/30/05
Posts: 172
Loc: Texas
|
|
It would behoove you to check out all the posts BEFORE you add to it. You also need to check history
-------------------- KTMason
|
corsig
stranger
Reged: 12/16/05
Posts: 16
|
|
DHN- You appearantly have no idea what you are talking about and you are seeing only what you want to see. There is hardly anything from the 1st to the 2nd or 2nd to the 3rd degree that would make me say to anyone' if you only saw what I saw" or "you wouldn't believe what I saw" that is a bunch of crap.
You even said it yourself "I have every right to do so interpret them as I see fit" so bascially you admit you are interpretting it as you want to see what you want to.
URRRGGGG I get so mad when people spew out quotes when they don't research first.
Yours truley Cory
Quote:
DHN said: It was never my intention of making yours or anyone elses blood boil. I have had long conversations with freemasons (Royal Arch) so perhaps I should have been clearer that I am referring to this order in particular, and I can understand that it is all too easy to take take things the wrong way. The conversations that I had with my father were as I said they were, although they are very ambiguous for instance you could say they he was confirming that the masonic God is indeed Christian by saying 'There is only one God'. It is well known in literature that the name 'Jebalon' is an eclectic term. I have known freemasons from a variety of faiths including Hindu, so as I am sure you know the brotherhood does not exclude non Christians. As I understand it their beliefs predate Christiainity, for instance Royal Arch Freemasonry, they refer to themselves as 'Antedeluvians' (survivors of the flood). If you read what my father said, he denied any knowledge of the so called 'Illuminati', and any assumption that he was fefraining from telling me the truth is my own personal interpretation. Although there are oaths to symbolically 'Have your tongue cut away' (not to be taken literally of course), when oaths of secrecy are taken to join freemasonry, I believe that when my father said 'fear if there is a God, not if there is not one', that he was actually speaking from a personal capacity sharing his own philosophy. I was also having a conversation about God with my brother at the time when he interjected.
I read some of my fathers freemasonic books, which used a great deal of abbreviations and there was mention of 'morning star', and although I could indeed be mistaken for misinterpreting the context, I have every right to do so interpret them as I see fit. To be clear I am not saying that on a personal level, that I believe that the 'Illuminati' had infultrated 'Royal Arch Freemasonry', but I daren't say that the only way to know is to be invited. I am not saying that your Lodge has anything to do with this topic, and that I am only speaking from the limited experiences that I have had within my own family, who were 'Royal Arch Freemasons'. So I cannot vouch for the Knight Templar Masons, Rossicrucians, and I am sure that there are a great deal of differences between these societies.
I can say that with respect that I have every right to share ideas and views, and that the secrecy surrounding such institutions only invites suspicion, and that the internet, book stores, television and cinema are rife with 'speculation' about what the secrecy. Correct me if I am wrong, even within freemasonry one degree is for the most part oblivious to the knowledge of the next degree. I remember one conversation I had with a friend of my fathers who was also a mason, and his blood boiled in a similar way. He said that 'You would not believe the things that I have seen', to which I replied 'You wouldn't believe the things I have seen either... but I can talk freely about them and you can't'. Having said that I was very close to him, and I loved my father.
I have nothing against you or your beliefs and you have every right to express your opinions. I personally believe that we are all connected to God on an inner level, and that we are ultimately all One. That I am 100% sure of, and that to me nothing else is written in stone, so I have an open mind and I am more than interested and open to what you have to say. Respectfully.
|
DHN
stranger
Reged: 01/04/06
Posts: 20
|
|
The Royal Arch Freemason did say to me "You would not believe the things that I have seen" to be precise, and not "you wouldn't believe what I saw" as you stated or "if you only saw what I saw". I made no interpretation, and was merely qouting the converastion. He was also as "mad" as you at the time, and clearly as defensive, so perhaps he was exagerating in some way, despite that it is not "a bunch of crap", and you have no idea what this individual had experienced.
Seeing how that made you so mad here is some more information, my uncle left the order as he was appalled that no one at a his lodge meeting would help whilst a fellow mason was having a cardiac arrest, instead they decided to carry on as normal, and the man later died on the way to the hospital. Again a true account of an individuals experiences and should be interpreted as such, and it would naturally be a mistake to tar everyone with the same brush, and that was certainly never my intention.
Edited by DHN (03/06/06 09:18 PM)
|
corsig
stranger
Reged: 12/16/05
Posts: 16
|
|
I'm sorry- I just can't believe that the whole lodge sat by while another was having a heart attack and then carried on like nothing happened. This isn't a forum to slam the Masons it's a forum to discuss the books and topics of Dan Brown.
I'm sure you can find many anti mason boards out there with like minded folks.
Regards, Cory
|
DHN
stranger
Reged: 01/04/06
Posts: 20
|
|
It is a true story whether you believe it or not, and it is your interpretation and judgement that I am anti mason not mine. Far from it in fact as I mentioned before my father was a freemason, my grandfather and great grandfather, and they were good people, and did a lot of charitable work through freemasonry. I see no harm in discussing such accounts, in the same way I see no harm in monty python pulling the leg (especially the one with the trouser leg pulleg up, to ensure a firmer grip) at secret societies.
It should also be of no surprise that a topic about the Illuminati is invariably going to lead to freemasonry as it has in this thread, that is the nature of discussions like this.
respectfully
|
corsig
stranger
Reged: 12/16/05
Posts: 16
|
|
OK- I will agree with your last comment about Masonry inevitably getting brought up, especially in this type of topic. I'm a fair guy and will appoligize when I am wrong.
And I do like Monty Python also.
Mason's tend to get defensive when they feel people are coming down on them because there are many untruths that get spread around with not one grain of truth.
Cory
|
ktmason
member
Reged: 11/30/05
Posts: 172
Loc: Texas
|
|
Brother Corsig
Give it up, you are wasting your time. These folks will believe anything but truth. Thats the reason I no longer post here.
Read all the anti masonry stuff on the fundimentalist sites, and conspiracy sites....this guys post is practically verbatim from others I have read. You can not speak the truth to them....they will not believe it. You and I both know that NO lodge would ever overlook a brother in need. He is not speaking the truth and knows it.
It would be much better to zip on over to "Freemasonry Universal" (http://s15.invisionfree.com/FreemasonryUniversal/index.php?)or the "Trestle board" and converse with those of a like mind and read this stuff for a laugh. They will not listen.
To get along here you need to hate your country, believe anything, and find fault with every government known to man. Save your money bro, we take over the world next week.
OOPS..sorry, sprung a leak in our lodge bathroom....gonna have to be next month!
God, if we ONLY had the power they think we do.....
-------------------- KTMason
Edited by ktmason (03/08/06 02:13 AM)
|
DHN
stranger
Reged: 01/04/06
Posts: 20
|
|
I am speaking the truth, but I can understand that you would have difficulty in believing it. As I stated before this account is an isolated incident and naturally does not apply to other lodges. Also the man did receive help from my uncle, who was a mason at that time, although no one else offered assistance. So technically he did not 'overlook a brother in need'. However it did happen, his name was Frank Rivers and he lived in Blackheath, but it really does not matter to me one way or the other if you believe it or not.
You are making sweeping statements yourself when you accuse people of hating their country, believing anything, and finding fault with every government known to man. These kind of remarks come across as being somewhat elitist. Generally one should accept that if you belong to a secret society, that it is only going to invite suspision in others. I don't believe you have any more power than anybody else, so I disagree when you say 'if we ONLY had the power they think we do'. I believe people collectively have power as part brotherhood of man, and woman as one.
Edited by DHN (03/08/06 05:54 AM)
|
Arras
enthusiast
Reged: 05/24/04
Posts: 263
Loc: B.C., Canada
|
|
Quote:
ktmason said: Give it up, you are wasting your time. These folks will believe anything but truth...
... You can not speak the truth to them....they will not believe it.
...They will not listen.
To get along here you need to hate your country, believe anything, and find fault with every government known to man.
Speaking of folks who "will not listen," I've explained to you in detail several times, both publicly and privately that I do not hate America. EVDebs has said essentially the same thing in his postings. You don't seem to want to believe that, however, so how are you in any better position to look down on people who may be skeptical about your claims?
You seem to think that "find[ing] fault with every government known to man" implies hating countries or systems of government. It should not be an act of treason to point out problems, mistakes, and flaws in one's government. Frankly, I think the people who have the courage to point out problems and work to get them fixed care more about the country than those who prefer to pretend the problems don't exist. Criticism--when it's constructive--is how the world gets better, not worse.
On the other hand, if you've drunk so much of the Kool-Aid that you've effectively immunized yourself against the hazardous effects of exposure to facts, then there's not much anyone is going to be able to do to reach you. If your mind is truly that closed to the truth, you're a lost cause--just like the people you're criticizing in this post.
Personally I'm ambivalent about Freemasonry--I have only a Devil's Advocate's interest in the matter of whether there's some great conspiracy at work or not. Others here may have more passionate convictions on either side, and I gather that your main beef is with them. With regard to those at the conspiracy theory end of the spectrum, you may be right about your inability to dissuade them from their beliefs--the very nature of any good conspiracy theory is that no amount of factual evidence can ever prove or disprove it.
As a case in point, a die-hard conspiracy theorist could argue that Masons like yourself are the innocent dupes of a larger conspiracy. In organizations with partitioned, hierarchical knowledge, after all, it's accepted that members learn more of the secrets of the organization as they ascend in rank. Perhaps, then, the conspiracy theorist might argue, the highest-ranking members are finally let in on the greater conspiracy, which is kept secret from all lower ranks. No matter how many ranks (or degrees) you might claim there to be, such a conspiracy theorist can always posit that there's one more above that one--a "secret" or "shadow" degree. Completely unprovable, but for the same reasons it's also impossible to disprove, allowing people to go on believing whatever they want. Hence the beauty--and frustration--of conspiracy theories.
The only way to change the mind of someone with that kind of inclination to believe is to address the reasons he might want to believe in the conspiracy theory. What makes Freemasonry such an easy target is the fact that for most of its history it kept secrets. In recent years, the efforts to "open up" Freemasonry--everyone and his dog seems to have written a book about it--have tried to dispel a lot of the suspicions about the organization, but it's impossible for an outsider to ever know that these books contain the whole truth. It's a bit like dealing with someone who's kept secrets from you for most of your life, and one day says he wants to "come clean"--given his secretive past, do you take what he tells you now at face value, or with a large grain of salt? I can understand why some people will be skeptical of anything published in any of these tell-all books, as much as you're willing to swear that it's all there between the covers.
All of that said, however, take heart from the fact that your efforts to educate the rest of us about Freemasonry are not altogether in vain. The die-hard conspiracy theorists I described above will not be moved to change their minds, of course, but remember that they represent the extreme end of the spectrum. The "moderates" are out there in much larger numbers, reading what you write, they just don't post. If what you write sounds reasonable, you'll reach those people, even if they never drop you a line to thank you for it. Don't judge the entire forum commmunity based on what the most vocal posters have to say--some of us just like to hear the sound of our own voices
|
EVDebs
enthusiast
Reged: 07/10/05
Posts: 272
|
|
Arras
My posts on other threads here at cultofdanbrown stem from my own dad's Freemasonic background (it was good for him and he was the best man I've ever known btw) and from the writings of John J. Robinson, whose Born In Blood: The Lost Secrets of Freemasonry started me off.
The linkage between the Knights Templar vs. Knights Hospitalers, now known as the Knights of Malta, lead me inevitably, to the conclusion that KOM throughout history and using other Catholic organizations, such as the Jesuits, did conspire against the KTs now morphed into the Freemasons. Robinson's book shows that the KOM was the target of a reprisal, The Peasant's Revolt, in the latter 1300s England. The KOM/Hospitalers received most of the Templars former properties and wealth, hence their undying loyalty to the papacy and the aristocrats who put them in their high places.
Furthermore, the KOM's aristocratic 'bent' has them now sitting at the UN with permanent observer status. Their behindthescenes running of the US's CIA from day one is also most illuminating (pardon the pun).
Their Will Be Done by Martin A. Lee, motherjones archives
http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/1983/07/willbedone.html
I believe the Scottish Rite and all the 'occult' gobbledygook that runs with it were injected into Freemasonry past the original three degrees, which originated with the Knights Templar, by Ramsay in the 1700s with Jesuit help, in order to eventually use the same smear campaign against them as the original charges in 1307 against DeMolay et al.
The aristocratic preponderance and tendency in all of these secret societies belies the original 'everyman' of the KT's underground democratic groups they originated from. Liberty, Equality, Fraternity...nowadays more like "Show Me The Money !", IMHO.
Edited by EVDebs (03/09/06 02:06 AM)
|
AAnnAArchy
Gifted Procrastinator
Reged: 10/20/03
Posts: 643
Loc: Las Vegas
|
|
ktmason Quote:
Give it up, you are wasting your time. These folks will believe anything but truth. Thats the reason I no longer post here.
Wait, I'm rubbing my eyes. Did I see this post, by you, here? It's hard to "quit (us)".
|
Cornflower
journeyman
Reged: 02/27/06
Posts: 63
Loc: Russia
|
|
I knew nothing about the Illuminati before reading ‘Angels & Demons’. I always realize the author makes assumptions in his books. So if I am interested in something I use dictionaries. To my surprise I could find a little information about the Illuminati in my books. I tried to translate something into English. The dictionary of foreign words says the Illuminati were the members of the secret religious-political society in Europe mainly in Bavaria in the second half of 18th century. The Atheistic dictionary gives some more information. It says: ‘The Illuminati were the secret organization (order) adjoining to masonry. It was founded in Bavaria in 1776 by A. Weishaupt who based on the doctrine of “illumination”. Such Christian theologians as Augustinus, Bonaventura stated that natural strength of human mind was insufficiently for cognition of “the eternal truth”. This cognition required enlightenment which had been the result of illumination of human mind with light of divine revelation. The doctrine was assumed as the basis of their ideas about social order and nature of enlightenment’. I don’t pretend on deep knowledge of Illuminati or masonry history. This thread and other sources gave me some interesting information. It is enough for me. I only wonder at one thing. If the Illuminati wanted to create ‘a single unified world state - a kind of secular New World Order’ (‘Angels and Demons’, chapter 11), why the atheistic propaganda didn’t point to that fact? And having read this thread I understood I should never be a mason. By the way, can a woman be a mason?
| |